# Turkey Ends Currency-Protected Savings Program

# Turkey Ends Currency-Protected Savings Program

## Introduction

The Turkish Central Bank’s recent announcement on the **termination of the FX-protected deposit scheme (KKM)** marks one of the most critical shifts in Turkey’s monetary policy landscape since 2021. With the scheme scheduled to end by **the close of 2025**, regulators have already revised rules on **reserve requirement remuneration** and **commission practices** tied to the program.

At its peak, the KKM scheme covered deposits worth **$140 billion**, but this figure has now dwindled to **$11 billion**. The drawdown reflects both structural weaknesses in the policy and broader market dynamics. This article provides a **comprehensive cause–effect analysis**, highlighting **why the scheme was introduced, why it is being phased out, and what implications await individuals, businesses, and the Turkish economy.**

---

## Background of the KKM Scheme

* **Policy Rationale (2021)**  
    In late 2021, when the Turkish lira lost **44% of its value against the dollar**, the KKM scheme was introduced to stabilize currency markets. The idea was to **shield savers from FX volatility** while keeping deposits in lira.
    
* **Structure of the Scheme**  
    Individuals and corporates could place lira deposits into special accounts with a **state-backed guarantee** against depreciation losses. Any gap between lira interest rates and FX depreciation was covered by the Treasury and the Central Bank.
    
* **Performance Timeline**
    
    * 2021: Lira fell **44%**, scheme rapidly gained traction.
        
    * 2022: Lira lost **29%**, Treasury costs escalated.
        
    * 2023: Lira lost **37%**, KKM coverage peaked.
        
    * 2024: Depreciation slowed to **16%**, scheme balances declined.
        

---

## Causes of Termination

1. **Mounting Fiscal Costs**
    
    * Covering FX depreciation created a **budgetary burden**.
        
    * Treasury outflows to compensate depositors strained public finances.
        
2. **Distortion of Monetary Policy**
    
    * Artificially sustained lira deposits limited **interest rate effectiveness**.
        
    * Monetary transmission mechanisms weakened, undermining inflation targeting.
        
3. **Market Confidence Issues**
    
    * Heavy reliance on KKM signaled **policy fragility**.
        
    * Investors perceived the scheme as a **short-term fix** rather than a structural solution.
        
4. **Shrinking Participation**
    
    * Deposits shrank from **$140B → $11B**, showing reduced demand.
        
    * Higher domestic interest rates and alternative instruments made KKM unattractive.
        

---

## Consequences of Termination

### 1\. For Households and Businesses

* **Shift to Traditional Deposits**: As remuneration rates increase, lira deposits may become attractive on their own.
    
* **Exposure to FX Risk**: Savers will once again carry the full exchange-rate burden.
    
* **Corporate Balance Sheets**: Firms that relied on KKM as a hedging tool must adopt alternative risk-management strategies.
    

### 2\. For the Central Bank

* **Policy Flexibility**: Ending KKM allows **cleaner interest rate management**.
    
* **Reduced Fiscal Burden**: Treasury no longer absorbs FX losses.
    
* **Credibility Gain**: Phasing out ad hoc policies signals a return to orthodoxy.
    

### 3\. For the Turkish Economy

* **Short-Term Volatility**: A possible increase in dollarization as savers migrate back to FX.
    
* **Medium-Term Stability**: Enhanced credibility may attract portfolio inflows.
    
* **Inflation Dynamics**: Reduced monetary distortion supports anti-inflation strategy.
    

---

## Regulatory Adjustments

Following the termination, the Central Bank announced revisions to:

* **Reserve Requirement Remuneration**: More market-oriented remuneration encourages banks to rely on traditional deposits.
    
* **Commission Practices**: Abolishing special commission incentives tied to KKM realigns banking practices with conventional risk–return metrics.
    

These adjustments are part of a **structural normalization agenda** aimed at anchoring expectations.

---

## Strategic Implications

### For Policymakers

* **Gradual Exit is Key**: Phasing out KKM too abruptly risks capital flight.
    
* **Communication Strategy**: Consistent signaling is essential to avoid destabilizing expectations.
    

### For Banks

* **Product Innovation**: New hedging instruments (derivatives, FX-linked bonds) may replace KKM.
    
* **Liquidity Management**: Banks will need to rebalance reserve strategies without KKM support.
    

### For Investors

* **Renewed Confidence**: Policy normalization may improve Turkey’s investment climate.
    
* **FX Hedging Costs**: Investors must account for higher volatility premiums in the post-KKM environment.
    

---

## Conclusion

The **end of the KKM scheme** is not just a technical adjustment but a **structural shift in Turkey’s economic governance**. Initially launched to **contain a currency crisis**, it succeeded in slowing dollarization but at the cost of **fiscal discipline and policy credibility**.

Its termination—backed by regulatory revisions—marks a pivot towards **orthodox monetary policy**, signaling to domestic and international stakeholders that Turkey aims to normalize its economic framework. While short-term volatility is inevitable, the **medium-term outlook may strengthen** if reforms are pursued consistently.

info@ozmconsultancy.com

![](https://cdn.hashnode.com/res/hashnode/image/upload/v1756016929816/03235af3-197f-49c2-8983-1a63bc43e58a.png align="center")